Matt Kennedy: Has the Episcopal Church really been "Falsely Accused"? Part 1

The problem with his argument, as we shall see, is that if indeed voices like Spong’s and Borg’s are marginal rather than representative, why O why has there been so little opposition to them? If, in fact, TEC as a whole truly holds to the content (rather than just the form) of the Creeds etc you would expect at least some rigorous and sustained opposition to teachers like Spong and Borg to arise not just from the triple headed beast, but from more “moderate” quarters in the Church.

This morning’s article is the first installment in a series of articles commenting on and responding to Falsely Accused by the Rev. Thomas Woodward. Fr. Woodward seeks to disabuse his readers of the notion that he and his fellow travellers in the Episcopal Church have led the Episcopal Church into heresy/apostasy. In fact, in a rather odd twist Fr. Woodward claims that the leaders of TEC are actually “reasserting” the “traditional teachings” of the Episcopal Church over and against the maliciously destructive accusations of the triple-headed beast (the ACC, the Network and the Church of Nigeria). the rest