American Babies Are Ruining Everything
The truth is more brains will likely mean cleaner energy technologies.
By WILLIAM MCGURN
August 3, 2009
Forget about the birthers, and the nutty claims that Barack Obama was not born in the United States.
More and more, we are hearing from people who might best be described as anti-birthers. Their claims have nothing to do with long- versus short-form Hawaiian birth certificates. Instead, they advance a simple proposition: that the birth of each additional American child is a kind of calamity for the environment.
The most recent example of anti-birth thinking comes from Paul Murtaugh and Michael Schlax of Oregon State University. In a study called “Reproduction and the carbon legacies of individuals,” they suggest that if you truly care about the environment, it’s not enough to trade your SUV for a Prius, use the right lightbulbs, or limit your lawn to organic fertilizers. To the contrary, you need to start thinking about something way more important: i.e., having one less child.
The “basic premise,” the study reports, is that “a person is responsible for emissions of his descendents.” the rest
2 Comments:
Unreal. Sad. Lord, have mercy.
I've never felt better about attending the University of Oregon, rather than the aforementioned state institution.
Go Ducks.
Post a Comment
<< Home